Weekly ETF SPY: Nasdaq-100 Fulfills Down Side Target and Bounces

The Nasdaq-100 almost had its first 5%+ correction in over six months. Although the decline has been on the shallow side, it has already fulfilled the initial down side target issued by the Profit Radar Report.

This ETF SPY follows up on the May 23, ETF SPY, which focused on the Nasdaq-100.

The May 23, ETF SPY was special, because it essentially provided a sneak peek of the kind of analysis provided by the Profit Radar Report.

To quickly review, the May 23, ETF SPY noted the May 22 reversal day (see chart above) and strongly suggested that lower prices are ahead along with this low-risk entry:

Prices often retest a previously broken support level, so a move up to the red trend line (@ 3,033) would be a low-risk opportunity to go short.”

That retest of the trend line occurred on May 28 and once more on May 30. In fact, I tweeted the following message and chart real time on May 30 at 11:18 am PST:

Hourly resistance line is at 3,023 for Nasdaq-100 – 74.22 for QQQ. This is a low-risk short entry with tight stop-loss.” >> follow iSPYETF on Twitter.

How low should the Nasdaq go? The June 2, Profit Radar Report stated that: “Important support and initial down side target is 2,905.”

Although the Nasdaq missed its down side target by a few points yesterday, it briefly dipped below the trend channel, but staged a reversal and finished with a green candle low and a close above support.

As you can tell by the first chart, I wrote this article on Thursday afternoon. At the time I didn’t know we’d see such a strong up day today, but yesterday’s article on the deeply oversold NYSE advance/decline ratio highlighted the “potential for a rally that lasts more than a couple of days.”

Yesterday’s Profit Radar Report stated the following: “The Nasdaq-100 dipped below channel support and ended the day with a green reversal candle, a close above support and a small bullish RSI divergence. Today’s decline may have exhausted short-term selling pressure.

It’s too early to tell how far this rally will run. We’ll use our comprehesive analysis radar to spot the next low-risk entry point – long or short.

Did you miss the May 23, ETF SPY, but want to receive future ETF SPYs?

>> Sign up for the FREE ETF NEWSLETTER and get the ETF SPY delivered to you.

Premium research is available via the Profit Radar Report. >> Click here to test drive the Profit Radar Report for free.

Advertisements

S&P 500 – Technical Analysis Shows the Trend

Markets are inherently unpredictable, but technical analysis is the most accurate forecasting tool available to investors. Since technical analysis is based on past price action, it is quite simple to confirm (or expose) when and where technical analysis has been right or wrong.

Some define technical analysis as mumbo jumbo, others (and that’s the official definition) see it as a method of forecasting prices based on past market activity.

Isn’t using past market activity (or prices) to forecast future prices like driving by looking in the rearview mirror? That’s a great question.

The Past Matters

Why does the past matter? Allow me to use a tennis analogy. Roger Federer (possibly the best ever all-around tennis player) has never won a clay court match against Rafael Nadal (possibly the best ever clay court tennis player) at the French Open Tournament (one of the big four Grand Slam tournaments).

Who do you think has a mental advantage the next time Federer and Nadal meet at the French Open? Federer knows he’s never beaten Nadal at the French Open, Nadal knows he’s never lost to Federer at the French Open.

Federer has to overcome a mental ‘resistance’ to beat Nadal at the French Open. I use the term mental ‘resistance’ because it relates to resistance (and/or support) seen in the securities market.

Charts of specific securities, such as the S&P 500, reflect the mental state of the composite of all investors. Charts reveal past price areas where either sellers or buyers prevailed, creating areas of support or resistance.

Being unaware of previously established support/resistance levels is like climbing a ladder without knowing which steps are broken.

Past Significance of Support/Resistance Levels

The proof is in the pudding, so let’s take a look at a 14-year chart of the S&P 500 Index (corresponding ETF: SPDR S&P 500 ETF – SPY).

The chart includes four long-term support/resistance levels made up of two trend lines (red lines) and two parallel channels (black and dashed lines).

The trend channels are created by connecting the 2002 and 2009 lows with the 2000 high (dashed black line) and 2007 high (solid black line). Since the last touch point of this channel is the 2009 low, it could be used as a guide only thereafter.

2000 High Parallel Channel

In May 2011, the S&P approached the upper dashed parallel channel resistance (gray circle). I remember that time vividly as my wife and I were vacationing on a little island in the Bahamas (for some reason the market usually sells off when I’m on vacation).

My May 1, 2011 update for subscribers featured the chart below and stated: “The chart below updates the S&P’s position relative to various resistance levels and the ideal target range for a potentially historic market top. The ideal target range is between 1,369 and 1,382.

The next day (May 2, 2011) the S&P briefly spiked as high as 1,370.58  (right into the 1,369 – 1,382 target range) on news that Osama Bin Laden had been killed. The stock market euphoria was short-lived, as the S&P sold off, fell below trend line support (pink line) and ultimately plunged as much as 20%.

The S&P 500 paid attention to this parallel channel once more in November 2011, when it was used as a springboard for the most powerful leg of the post-2009 QE bull market.

2007 High Parallel Channel

In January 2013 the S&P 500 approached the ‘big brother version’ of the same parallel channel (this time the upper line was created by the 2007 not the 2000 high – gray circle).

The parallel channel resistance coincided with trend line resistance (red line). This was powerful resistance and I thought stocks would pause and temporarily reverse there … but they didn’t.

With that resistance out of the way, it was clear that the S&P wanted to test its all-time high and the next trend line resistance (red line) around 1,593.

It barely shows on the weekly bar chart, but the S&P was actually repelled by trend line resistance at 1,593 in April (subscribers of the Profit Radar Report went short at 1,593 and closed out short positions at 1,540).

This (temporary) decline from 1,593 to 1,536 left several open chart gaps (one at 1,588), that’s why we expected a deep retracement. That deep retracement however, turned into a rally to even higher highs.

With the S&P above the last trend line resistance and with no other overhead resistance levels caused by prior support/resistance levels left (the S&P carries no more ‘inherited technical burdens’), there is nothing holding stocks back.

That doesn’t mean stocks can’t and won’t decline, but as long as prices remain above trend line support, the larger trend is simply up.

Unlike the S&P 500 and Dow Jones (which are trading at all-time highs), the Nasdaq-100 still trades well below its heyday highs of the year 2000. This means there are more well-defined support and resistance levels available.

Those support/resistance levels are powerful risk management tools and can be used to find low-risk entries and high probability trade set ups.

At the time of this article’s publication, the Profit Radar Report is long the Nasdaq-100 with a stop-loss just beneath an important long-term support.

The Profit Radar Report reveals key support/resistance levels along with low-risk and/or high probability trade set ups.

Is Apple’s Decline Over?

Wow! Apple, the world’s largest company lost 31.6% of its market capitalization since mid-September. This week’s new price low showed the first real bullish divergence. Is AAPL’s decline over, at least for now?

The shares of the world’s largest company recovered a bit after falling as much as 31.6%. What’s the bigger story, the 31.6% drop or Wednesday’s 4% recovery?

The chart below shows that Wednesday’s low at 483 occurred right around double green trend line support.

This is pretty much in line with the expectation I shared via the December 10, article about Apple here on iSPYETF: “It seems to me that Apple is heading for a new low, perhaps around 480 – 490.”

The same article stated that: “A new low unconfirmed by a new RSI low would create a bullish divergence and possibly prove as a springboard for a more sustainable rally into Q1 2013.”

The new low was carved out against a bullish RSI divergence. Will that be enough to get Apple shares moving higher again?

percentR, the same indicator we used to confirm Apple’s top, has moved from below to above 20. This is considered a bearish low-risk entry. The regular ‘default trade’ is to go short with a stop-loss (based on closing prices) at Wednesday’s high.

However, going short may not be the greatest idea since Apple precisely hit our down side target against a bullish RSI divergence. It may be better to use RSI as an initial change of trend confirmation. A close above 510 would be positive.

Apple Sentiment Gauges

I like looking at sentiment extremes to gain an extra edge. Bullish extremes are bearish for the stock and vice verse. Unfortunately, there are no sentiment extremes for Apple.

The short interest on AAPL is within the normal range (about 2% of outstanding shares) as is the options put/call ratio. Other options measure a closer to optimistic than pessimistic extreme, which is odd considering Apple’s 31% tumble.

Apple Cycles and Seasonality

AAPL has enjoyed a multi-year bull market with average annual gains of 63% since 1998 (the first year of profitability after Steve Job’s return to Apple).

For that reason Apple’s seasonality has a distinct bullish bias. The beginning of the year is generally less bullish for Apple shares, but obviously a 14-year predominantly bullish seasonality chart is little help during this bear market period.

Summary

Sentiment and seasonality don’t provide much of an edge, so we’ll keep technicals in the driver’s seat. Based on the bullish RSI divergence there’s good potential for a bounce. percentR suggests to wait for a close above 510 before going long.

Due to the potential for an upcoming S&P 500 reversal, it will be smart to elevate stop-losses if prices do rally and keep a stop loss no lower than 480 initially.