Little Known ‘Indicator’ Trumps Banking Crisis, War, Debt Ceiling, etc.

Subscribers to iSPYETF’s free e-mail newsletter receive a market outlook, usually once a week. The market outlook below was sent out on May 11, 2023. If you’d like to sign up for the free e-newsletter, you may do so here (we will never share your e-mail with anyone, just as we don’t accept advertising).

Wow, it’s already been a month since my last free Market Outlook e-mail. So, what’s new?

Not much. The market is stuck in a range, which is what we expected as per the 2023 S&P 500 Forecast.

I feel kind of bad for not posting more free updates, but unlike most online outlets that need eyeballs to drive their marketing revenue, I don’t just post (or send) catchy stuff for the sake of getting readers’ attention. My job is to inform, not to unnecessarily rile up. That’s also why iSPYETF is an ad-free zone.

Think about it, how much time have you spent (and wasted?) the last few months reading market analysis and getting your portfolio ready for the ‘next big move’?

You didn’t waste that time on iSPYETF. When there’s no change to my outlook, I don’t want to divert your attention from more important or more fun stuff to do (of course subscribers still get updates twice a week, but there hasn’t been much new to say either).

The March 3 Market Outlook (What Nobody Wants to Say) reiterated the odds of more sideways churning. Within that churning-mania, the April 2 Profit Radar Report forecast is still playing out:

It is possible that stocks will suffer a smaller pullback starting next week, recover and grind towards 4,200 – 4,300.”

The grind to 4,200 – 4,300 is just that: A grind. Here is why 4,200 – 4,300 is a must watch zone:

– Since 2009, the S&P has closed every single down side chart gap. As mentioned in prior Profit Radar Reports (i.e. August 24, 2022: “Regardless of how much lower the S&P goes immediately, we can almost be certain that the open gap at 4,218.70 will be closed.”) we assume that at minimum the chart gap at 4,218.70 (dashed purple line) will be closed before a potentially persistent leg lower. This little-know ‘indicator’ has been more helpful in navigating the market than any other news development.

– The 61.8% Fibonacci retracement is at 4,311.29. Wave 2 counter trend rallies (bear market rallies) commonly relapse around the 61.8% level.

– There is natural resistance around the August 2022 high at 4,325.28.

The weight of evidence does not favor a major reversal (from up to down) in the 4,218.70 – 4,325.28 zone, but it remains nonetheless an inflection zone that comes with risk of a reversal. In other words, if a reversal is going to occur, it would likely be in that zone.

What About?

But what about narrow leadership? That’s been a concern for weeks. At the end of April, the entire YTD S&P 500 gain came from 8 mega cap companies. This isn’t the most healthy environment, but it’s also not consistently bearish.

One way to provide context of mega cap outperformance is to compare the cap weighted Nasdaq-100 ETF (QQQ) to the equal weighted Nasdaq-100 ETF (QQQE, data goes back to 2012). 

The chart below plots QQQ against the QQQ/QQQE ratio. The ratio soared in 2023 (= mega cap strength). As the dashed lines show, ratio highs coincided with stock market highs in 2020 and 2021, but not every time.

It’s easy to pinpoint a ratio high in hind sight, but we don’t have that luxury in real time and we don’t know if we are at a ratio high or not. While it would be better to see broad market participation, mega cap strength does not have to be an immediate negative for stocks.

But what about the debt ceiling? Invoking the 14th amendment (I don’t comment on the legal or ethical merits of political decisions, just the potential impact on markets) could further deteriorate investors’ faith in the US government and intensify the move from public assets (I.e. government bonds) into private assets (i.e. stocks).

This mega trend continues to be one big reason why I’ve not turned outright bearish, even in 2022.

Short-term, nothing is obviously happening while the S&P 500 remains within the blue zone. Even when it finally breaks out (yes, at some point it will), I doubt that the direction of the break will be the next dominant direction.

Gold and Silver have been on the verge of a breakout, but as long as the below shown resistance levels remain in place, the breakout is on hold. Notice that silver also dropped back to support today.

For continued updates, purely fact based research, and objective analysis, sign up for the Profit Radar Report

The Profit Radar Report comes with a 30-day money back guarantee, but fair warning: 90% of users stay on beyond 30 days.

Barron’s rates iSPYETF a “trader with a good track record,” and Investor’s Business Daily writes “Simon says and the market is playing along.”

Nasdaq & S&P 500 Update

Subscribers to iSPYETF’s free e-mail newsletter receive a market outlook, usually once a week. The market outlook below was sent out on February 3, 2022. If you’d like to sign up for the free e-newsletter, you may do so here (we will never share your e-mail with anyone, just as we don’t accept advertising).

The January 19 Profit Radar Report gave a down side target of 4,300, which was reached and slightly exceeded on January 24.

The decline into the January 24 low looks like a 3 wave affair. As mentioned in last week’s Free Market Outlook, I thought the decline would turn into 5 waves, but it hasn’t.

In fact, price overlapped the January 10 low (wave 1). In a standard 5-wave decline, wave 4 is not allowed to exceed wave 1 (an explanation of Elliott Wave Theory is available here).

There are other, more messy, patterns that allow for a continuous decline (such as the expanding diagonal outlined in purple below), but a 3-wave move into a low can also mean this leg of the correction is over.

The QQQ chart below, featured in the January 26 Profit Radar Report, highlighted support and the odds of a bounce. QQQ bounced as much as 10% from the low, but this doesn’t change the fact that QQQ dropped almost 17% over the prior month.

This sounds scary, but quick tumbles like that happened before.

Are they a sign of selling exhaustion or do they usually trigger bear markets?

To find out, I identified the time periods that most closely correlate to the Nasdaq-100 price pattern over the past 6 months (which includes the last leg up and subsequent selloff).

I limited the precedents to 10 and calculated the forward returns for the next 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months (as usually).

A common theme emerged and the results were quite surprising. The entire study was published in the January 30, 2022 Profit Radar Report.

Continuous updates, the results of the Nasdaq study and out-of-the box technical and historical analysis is available via the Profit Radar Report

The Profit Radar Report comes with a 30-day money back guarantee, but fair warning: 90% of users stay on beyond 30 days.

Barron’s rates iSPYETF a “trader with a good track record,” and Investor’s Business Daily writes “Simon says and the market is playing along.”

Did the Weak Hands Get Flushed?

Subscribers to iSPYETF’s free e-mail newsletter receive a market outlook, usually once a week. The market outlook below was sent out on January 13, 2022. If you’d like to sign up for the free e-newsletter, you may do so here (we will never share your e-mail with anyone, just as we don’t accept advertising).

This week started with a bang; Nasdaq-100 and QQQ tumbled as much as 3% on Monday … but turned around and quickly erased those losses. This ‘flushing out of weak hands’ was exactly what I wrote about the day before in Sunday’s Profit Radar Report:

“The QQQ support shelf around 378 may be obvious enough to require a brief drop to about 375 to flush out weak hands with stop-losses just below 377. In terms of risk management, a move below 377 would be a warning while it lasts and allow for a drop to about 370. Knowing that such a move (to 370) may only be temporary, a move back above 379 – 383 would be an indication of more gains to come.”

As the chart below shows, weak hands (unconvinced bulls with stop-loss just below support at 377) have certainly been flushed out by Monday’s swiftly retraced drop.

Will the remaining ‘strong hands’ (or longs) be rewarded?

Elevated Nasdaq volatility, as measured by VXN (VXN is like the VIX for Nasdaq-100), has been a concern for many. VXN has been high when compared to the VIX (volatility for S&P 500). The chart below plots the S&P 500 against the VIX/VXN ratio (low ratio means Nasdaq-100 volatility is higher than S&P 500 volatility).

A low VIX/VXN ratio was common in the early 2000s but appeared less frequent in recent years. If we add a couple more requirements (see chart insert) we see that this condition only existed during two periods: 1995 – 2000 and 2020 – today.

The piper was paid eventually, but there were a lot of false ‘the top is in’ alarms before the actual top arrived.

As far as the S&P 500 is concerned, our trusty support line held again on Monday.

In fact, the S&P 500 may be carving out a somewhat rare but rather predictive pattern (thus far it’s checking all the boxes). This pattern provides a must hold support level, an up side target, and what will happen once the target is reached. I’ll certainly keep an eye on it.

Continued updates, out-of-the box analysis, forward performance based on historic precedents (Risk/Reward Heat Map) and the 2022 S&P 500 Forecast are available via the Profit Radar Report

The Profit Radar Report comes with a 30-day money back guarantee, but fair warning: 90% of users stay on beyond 30 days.

Barron’s rates iSPYETF a “trader with a good track record,” and Investor’s Business Daily writes “Simon says and the market is playing along.”

S&P 500: August Highs Make Investors Cry


Subscribers to iSPYETF’s free e-mail newsletter receive a market outlook, usually once a week. The market outlook below was sent out on September 9. If you’d like to sign up for the free e-newsletter, you may do so here (we will never share your e-mail with anyone, just as we don’t accept advertising).

The S&P 500 finished August perched on an all-time high (ATH). In the past, August highs have often made investors cry.

Since 1970, the S&P carved out 12 other August ATHs (it set a 6-year high in 1979 and missed a new ATH by a few tics in 1984). All 14 signal dates (starting with the first day of September) are shown and highlighted below.

It’s tough to cram 50 years of history into one chart, but we can still see that August ATHs preceded some challenging times (i. e. 1972, 1987, 2000, 2014). Let’s drill a bit deeper.

The chart below shows the S&P 500 forward performance starting with the first day of September. The 5 instances since 2000 are shown in yellow, the 9 instances prior to 2000 are shown in gray. 2020 (in red) shattered all precedents with the exception of 1986.

As the performance tracker (bottom table) shows, returns for the next 1 – 3 months have been dismal.

The above study was just 1 of 3 studies published in Monday’s Profit Radar Report, which also featured the latest Risk/Reward Heat Map (a visual tool that shows risk based on 100s of studies).

Stocks have been immune to any kind of risk projection so we need price to verify risk with a drop below support.

Below are some basic levels to help judge risk and reward. The Nasdaq QQQ ETF is up against resistance. It will take a break above resistance to unlock higher prices (perhaps a blow off top).

DJIA is stuck in a potential wedge. A move above and back below upper wedge resistance would be a warning signal, as would be a good close below the lower wedge line.

Monday’s Profit Radar Report showed the below Bitcoin Futures chart and pointed out that price is against resistance while over-bought, which meant short-term risk was elevated. Within hours, Bitcoin dropped 10,000 points, nearly 20%. This general bias is likely positive as long black trend channel support holds.

Continued updates, out-of-the box analysis and forward performance based on historic precedents are available via the

Continued updates and factual out-of-the box analysis are available via the Profit Radar Report

The Profit Radar Report comes with a 30-day money back guarantee, but fair warning: 90% of users stay on beyond 30 days.

Barron’s rates iSPYETF a “trader with a good track record,” and Investor’s Business Daily writes “Simon says and the market is playing along.”

Nasdaq-100 QQQ near Triple Support/Resistance

The February 19, 2020 PRR highlighted the Nasdaq-100 and QQQ wedge (purple lines) and stated: “The QQQ chart shows a rising wedge (ascending purple lines), subsequent breakout, and measured target (242.06). Fibonacci projection resistance is at 243.46 (red line), Those levels are 2 – 2.5% above today’s close.”

Barron’s rates iSPYETF as “trader with a good track record” and Investor’s Business Daily says: “When Simon says, the market listens.” Find out why Barron’s and IBD endorse Simon Maierhofer’s Profit Radar Report.

QQQ missed the measured target for the wedge breakout by a couple percent before falling hard. More interestingly, QQQ is now back at original wedge resistance (around 201), which is reinforced by the 200-day SMA and the 50% Fibonacci retracement level (February 19 high – March 23 low).

Just a couple of weeks ago, QQQ traded 17% below its 200-day SMA, and now it’s above the 200-day SMA, the quickest such recovery ever.

There’ve been 11 other times when QQQ clawed back from a 10% or more drop below its 200-day SMA to above the 200-day SMA rather quickly. The forward returns were inconsistent, but if QQQ relapsed, it tended to happen fairly quickly after the initial bounce back above the 200-day SMA.

In summary, there is a triple support/resistance zone at 200-202 for the QQQ, and how price behaves around this zone may set the stage for the coming days and weeks.

Continued updates, projections, buy/sell recommendations are available via the Profit Radar Report.

Simon Maierhofer is the founder of iSPYETF and the publisher of the Profit Radar Report. Barron’s rated iSPYETF as a “trader with a good track record” (click here for Barron’s evaluation of the Profit Radar Report). The Profit Radar Report presents complex market analysis (S&P 500, Dow Jones, gold, silver, euro and bonds) in an easy format. Technical analysis, sentiment indicators, seasonal patterns and common sense are all wrapped up into two or more easy-to-read weekly updates. All Profit Radar Report recommendations resulted in a 59.51% net gain in 2013, 17.59% in 2014, 24.52% in 2015, 52.26% in 2016, and 23.39% in 2017.

Follow Simon on Twitter @ iSPYETF or sign up for the FREE iSPYETF e-Newsletter to get actionable ETF trade ideas delivered for free.

Will Momentum Continue to Push Stocks Higher?

From December 3 – December 26, 2018, the S&P 500 lost 453 points. Since then, the S&P rallied 400 points.

Who would have thought that the worst December since 1931 would be followed by the best January since 1987?

Extremes Everywhere

We are truly living in a world of extremes. The rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer while historic heat waves and polar vortexes ravage the globe. Stock market extremes fit into the picture.

Although the relentlessness of this rally was unexpected (at least for me), the Profit Radar Report highlighted a tell tale sign of the latest buying extreme when 90% of NYSE-traded stocks advanced on January 4 (blue columns).

Barron’s rates iSPYETF as “trader with a good track record” and Investor’s Business Daily says: “When Simon says, the market listens.” Find out why Barron’s and IBD endorse Simon Maierhofer’s Profit Radar Report.

As the table and thumbnail charts below shows (originally published in the January 9 Profit Radar Report), this kind of breadth and momentum thrust is rare and almost always long-term bullish.

Confirmation?

The initial thrust is thus far confirmed by my favorite liquidity indicator (blue graph, first chart), which has already retraced 88.82% of its prior losses, significantly more than the 63% S&P 500 retracement.

A new high of the liquidity indicator prior to a S&P 500 high will be additional confirmation of further gains.

Momentum vs Over-bought

The S&P 500 ended Tuesday overbought (based on RSI-2 – bottom graph, first chart). This is not the first time the S&P has become over-bought, but in 2019 it’s been a ‘mind of matter’ pattern; As long as the market doesn’t mind, it doesn’t matter.

Red line resistance, the next potential speed bump, is around 2,745.

The Elliott Wave pattern for almost every major index is up to interpretation, but the Nasdaq-100 QQQ ETF pattern offers slightly more clarity than others.

As the chart above shows, QQQ could be completing a 5-wave move. Upon completion, a 5-wave move is followed by a correction (quite commonly a nasty one), and further gains.

One anomaly that also cautions against chasing stocks at this stage is the VIX. As the chart above shows, the VIX has fallen back to support around 15, in fact, it’s at the lowest level since October. At the same time, the S&P 500 is still below its 200-day SMA.

It’s unusual for the VIX to drop to a 3-4 month low while the S&P is still below its 200-day SMA. In fact, over the past 20 years it only happened during the 2001/02 and 2008 bear markets. Forward returns were consistently negative.

In summary, chasing stocks at this stage does not seem prudent. There should be a pullback … and who knows, perhaps the pullback also gathers momentum. We’ll evaluate when we get there.

Continued updates are available via the Profit Radar Report.

Simon Maierhofer is the founder of iSPYETF and the publisher of the Profit Radar Report. Barron’s rated iSPYETF as a “trader with a good track record” (click here for Barron’s evaluation of the Profit Radar Report). The Profit Radar Report presents complex market analysis (S&P 500, Dow Jones, gold, silver, euro and bonds) in an easy format. Technical analysis, sentiment indicators, seasonal patterns and common sense are all wrapped up into two or more easy-to-read weekly updates. All Profit Radar Report recommendations resulted in a 59.51% net gain in 2013, 17.59% in 2014, 24.52% in 2015, 52.26% in 2016, and 23.39% in 2017.

Follow Simon on Twitter @ iSPYETF or sign up for the FREE iSPYETF e-Newsletter to get actionable ETF trade ideas delivered for free.

S&P 500: Long-term Explains Short-term

In late October we were looking for a strong counter trend rally (S&P 500 projection published here), and wanted to short the S&P 500 in the 2,830 – 2,850 zone (red bar). The S&P fell short of our target, and relapsed at 2,817.

This week we wanted to buy the S&P 500 after a brief dip below trend channel support (2,615 – green bar). Again, the S&P fell short of our target, and bounced from 2,631.

Why is the market falling short of our targets, and what does it mean?

Long-term Outlook Explains Short-term Movements

Here is one explanation (in my humble opinion the most plausible one):

In mid-October I analyzed various indicators to help determine the S&P’s larger pattern, and ideally future path. Indicators included:

  • Breadth & momentum
  • Price patterns
  • Support & resistance levels
  • Liquidity & breath
  • Investor sentiment
  • Elliott Wave Theory
  • Seasonality & cycles

The entire analysis, along with the three most likely scenarios were published in the October 14 Profit Radar Report.

Barron’s rates iSPYETF as “trader with a good track record” and Investor’s Business Daily says: “When Simon says, the market listens.” Find out why Barron’s and IBD endorse Simon Maierhofer’s Profit Radar Report.

The chart and commentary below were published as scenario #1:

Scenario #1: The September high is wave 3 (primary degree). The current decline is wave 4. Waves 4 are generally choppy, drawn out, frustrating and nearly impossible to predict. Shown are the two most common Fibonacci retracement (down side) targets: 

— 23.6%: 2,500 — 38.2%: 2,228. Once this correction is complete, the stock market will rally to its final bull market high (wave 5). 

Although a new multi-year bear market with much lower targets is possible, the size of the bearish divergence at the September high and lack of absolute investor bullishness surrounding the top, suggest that scenario #1 or #2 are more likely than #3.”

“Waves 4 are generally choppy, drawn out, frustrating and nearly impossible to predict.” True to that! Although we correctly anticipated the decline from the 2,800s and the bounce from the 2,600s, the notion that the S&P is in a larger-scale wave 4 correction would explain why price keeps falling short of my targets.

Short-term Outlook

The hourly chart below, published in the November 27 Profit Radar Report, showed that 2,685 was a short-term inflection point, because that’s where a number of trend lines met up with an open chart gap.

As it turns out, the break above 2,685 uncorked quite a pop (I personally would have preferred a drop). Next resistance is not far away, but as long as trade remains above the breakout level (2,685), it can continue to move higher (likely in a choppy fashion) … and reach the 2,830 – 2,850 range missed earlier this month.

Nasdaq-100 – QQQ ETF

Unlike the S&P 500, the Nasdaq-100 QQQ carved out a bullish divergence at the November 20 low. The November 21 PRR stated that: “The Nasdaq-100 QQQ gave back most of its gains, but closed above short-term support. Since QQQ already carved out a bullish divergence, bulls already have their window of opportunity to take trade higher, as long as support around 160 holds.”

Bulls took advantage of their window of opportunity, but resistance is not far away, and RSI-2 is nearing over-bought.

Summary

First the S&P 500 missed our up side target (2,830 – 2,850), then our down side target (2,615).

This is likely caused by the unpredictable nature of choppy wave 4 corrections. Nevertheless, the weight of evidence suggests that the S&P will hit (and exceed) both of the above target zones in the coming weeks/monhts.

Continued updates are available via the Profit Radar Report.

Simon Maierhofer is the founder of iSPYETF and the publisher of the Profit Radar Report. Barron’s rated iSPYETF as a “trader with a good track record” (click here for Barron’s evaluation of the Profit Radar Report). The Profit Radar Report presents complex market analysis (S&P 500, Dow Jones, gold, silver, euro and bonds) in an easy format. Technical analysis, sentiment indicators, seasonal patterns and common sense are all wrapped up into two or more easy-to-read weekly updates. All Profit Radar Report recommendations resulted in a 59.51% net gain in 2013, 17.59% in 2014, 24.52% in 2015, 52.26% in 2016, and 23.39% in 2017.

Follow Simon on Twitter @ iSPYETF or sign up for the FREE iSPYETF e-Newsletter to get actionable ETF trade ideas delivered for free.

Is FAANG Weakness Bearish for Stocks?

The spotlight has been on FAANG stocks (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google) for much of this bull market, but lately it’s gotten kind of quiet around them. Perhaps that’s because they are actually under-performing the Nasdaq-100.

Is FAANG weakness bearish for stocks?

FAANG vs Nasdaq-100

The chart below plots an equal weighted FAANG index against the Nasdaq-100. The dashed lines highlight non-confirmations.

The black lines mark times where new Nasdaq-100 highs were unconfirmed by FAANG (as currently the case), the blue lines mark times where new FAANG highs were unconfirmed by the Nasdaq-100.

Since 2014, there have been 7 similar non-confirmations, where FAANG were lagging the Nasdaq-100. The last 4 very followed by micro pullbacks and renewed strength for both. The first 3 saw slightly larger pullbacks before renewed strength.

It was actually more of a warning sign when the Nasdaq-100 failed to confirm new FAANG highs (August and December, 2015 – blue lines).

Based on the short available history, FAANG under-performance is not bearish for stocks in general.

Nasdaq-100

The Nasdaq-100 QQQ ETF chart looks more bullish than bearish, as trade is above long-term Fibonacci resistance at 181.80, and on the verge of breaking out of a triangle formation.

Above analysis was initially published in the August 26 Profit Radar Report. Barron’s rates iSPYETF as “trader with a good track record” and Investor’s Business Daily says: “When Simon says, the market listens.” Find out why Barron’s and IBD endorse Simon Maierhofer’s Profit Radar Report.

Simon Maierhofer is the founder of iSPYETF and the publisher of the Profit Radar Report. Barron’s rated iSPYETF as a “trader with a good track record” (click here for Barron’s profile of the Profit Radar Report). The Profit Radar Report presents complex market analysis (S&P 500, Dow Jones, gold, silver, euro and bonds) in an easy format. Technical analysis, sentiment indicators, seasonal patterns and common sense are all wrapped up into two or more easy-to-read weekly updates. All Profit Radar Report recommendations resulted in a 59.51% net gain in 2013, 17.59% in 2014, 24.52% in 2015, 52.26% in 2016, and 23.39% in 2017.

Follow Simon on Twitter @ iSPYETF or sign up for the FREE iSPYETF Newsletter to get actionable ETF trade ideas delivered for free.

US Stocks: 5 Intriguing Charts, 1 Conclusion

Here is a look at the 5 (in my humble opinion) most intriguing and important charts right now. As you will notice, not all charts point in the same direction. Nevertheless, I will conclude with a weight of evidence-based conclusion.

1) S&P 500 Tug of War

The July 15 Profit Radar Report introduced subscribers to a massively bullish S&P 500 chart pattern with an up side target of 3,000+.

Barron’s rates iSPYETF as “trader with a good track record” and Investor’s Business Daily says: “When Simon says, the market listens.” Find out why Barron’s and IBD endorse Simon Maierhofer’s Profit Radar Report.

The chart insert shows price since July 15. Thus far, triangle support has held, the pattern has not been invalidated, but also not confirmed.

Short-term, as brought out by the August 8 Profit Radar Report, sellers have a window of opportunity due to triple resistance around 2,860.

2) Nasdaq Resistance

The Nasdaq-100 QQQ is up against double resistance comprised of the red trend line and a Fibonacci projection level going back to its 2002 low. As long as resistance holds, bears have a window of opportunity to take QQQ lower.

3) Bear’s Best Friend

All major indexes (S&P 500, Dow Jones, Nasdaq, Russell 2000) have been dancing to the beat of their own drum.

For a broader assessment of US stock’s health, some look at the NY Composite (NYC), which includes some 2000 stocks.

The NYC thus far only retraced 61.8% of the decline from the January high. 61.8 is a Fibonacci number, in fact, it is the ideal retracement of a counter trend rally, a dead cat bounce. That’s what makes the NYC “bear’s best friend” right now.

A look under the hood however, reveals two important facts:

  • More stocks have been advancing than declining (blue graph)
  • The ratio of advancing stocks has slowed significantly (gray graph)

Based on the NYC advance/decline line and ratio, the most likely outcome is short-term weakness followed by longer-term strength.

4) VIX

The August 1 Profit Radar Report published the chart below, which plots the VIX against hedgers’ (smart money) exposure and seasonality. Based on those factors, a spike to 17 (red trend line) seemed likely.

This week, the VIX spiked from 10.17 to 15.02, a 47% move. Higher readings are still possible.

5) Doom-and-Gloom Hurray

Investors loved doom-and-gloom stories a couple weeks ago. I took a screenshot of most popular MarketWatch articles on July 31. The top two were:

  • Prepare for the biggest stock-market selloff in months, Morgan Stanley warns
  • This ‘prophet of doom’ predicts stock market will plunge more than 50%

Admittedly that’s anecdotal evidence, but heavily bearish investors tend to get burnt first. The early August rally did just that.

Conclusion

If you want to be bullish, there’s plenty of data to support your view.

If you want to be bearish, there’s plenty of data to support your view, too.

Looking at the data objectively, my conclusion (based on the weight of evidence) is that short-term weakness will provide at least one more buying opportunity.

Weakness may not materialize if the S&P 500, Nasdaq, NY Composite move above their respective resistance levels.

Support levels, up side targets and continuous updates are available in the Profit Radar Report.

Barron’s rates iSPYETF as “trader with a good track record” and Investor’s Business Daily says: “When Simon says, the market listens.” Find out why Barron’s and IBD endorse Simon Maierhofer’s Profit Radar Report.

Simon Maierhofer is the founder of iSPYETF and the publisher of the Profit Radar Report. Barron’s rated iSPYETF as a “trader with a good track record” (click here for Barron’s profile of the Profit Radar Report). The Profit Radar Report presents complex market analysis (S&P 500, Dow Jones, gold, silver, euro and bonds) in an easy format. Technical analysis, sentiment indicators, seasonal patterns and common sense are all wrapped up into two or more easy-to-read weekly updates. All Profit Radar Report recommendations resulted in a 59.51% net gain in 2013, 17.59% in 2014, 24.52% in 2015, 52.26% in 2016, and 23.39% in 2017.

Follow Simon on Twitter @ iSPYETF or sign up for the FREE iSPYETF Newsletter to get actionable ETF trade ideas delivered for free.

Free Access to the Profit Radar Report

For the first time ever, anyone can get FREE ACCESS to the Profit Radar Report. The last 6 complete Profit Radar Report updates covering the S&P 500, Dow Jones, Nasdaq, XLU, US dollar, EUR/USD, gold, silver, and 30-year Treasuries, TLT are available here. Enjoy!

Barron’s rates iSPYETF as “trader with a good track record” and Investor’s Business Daily says: “When Simon says, the market listens.” Find out why Barron’s and IBD endorse Simon Maierhofer’s Profit Radar Report.

April 4, 2018 (6:00pm PST)

Yesterday’s PRR stated that: “We will set our stop-loss at breakeven. If SPY gaps below 258.87 in the morning, we will keep our stop-loss at 256.”

Since SPY gapped lower and opened at 256.75, we set our stop-loss at 256. After another 200-day SMA seesaw, SPY closed at 263.56. We will now raise our stop-loss back to breakeven (258.87).

Monday’s PRR mentioned that the NY Composite a/d line is still above its February and March lows. The chart below provides more details. From March 23 – April 2, the S&P 500 drifted lower, while the NYC a/d line inched higher. This bullish divergence suggests that selling pressure is abating.

This fact, in addition to the S&P 500, DJIA and Nasdaq-100 hitting our down side targets and/or support (March 28 PRR) contributed to the SPY buy signal.

However, bullish outlooks are rare. In fact, some Elliott Wave Theory analysts are vehemently bearish, which is reminiscent of early March, when the March 7 PRR published the chart below and stated:

This is one of those times where it’s dangerous to rely solely on Elliott Wave Theory (EWT). Some EWT analysts currently advocate a 1 – 2 constellation to the up side (green labels), others a 1 – 2 to the down side (red labels). “1 – 2” meaning waves 1 and 2 are complete (or nearly so), with a powerful wave 3 (up or down) to follow, essentially EWT analysts expect either a melt-up or melt-down. We know at least one group will be wrong.

The path that would make most sense (in terms of fulfilling more indicators/patterns than the other paths) is continued range racing, an eventual re-test of the February panic low (blue box), and subsequent rally to 3,000 +/- (blue labels, or scenario #2 shown in the February 28 PRR).”

Our indicators supported the blue path weeks ago, and continue to do so (with or without another drop to 2,530 – 2,460).

However, we wanted to let subscribers know that we always monitor various developments, and if our indictors change (i.e. an increase in selling pressure or emergence of bearish divergences) we will have to adjust accordingly.

Currently we want to have some ‘skin in the game’ if stocks continue higher, but will continue to manage risk.

The DJIA may have finished the 5-waves lower shown in the March 28 PRR. The chart below shows some short-term resistance levels: Red line: 24,300. Trend channel: 24,700.

XLU continues to gnaw on resistance around 51. The pattern of this rally is not exactly bullish, but nevertheless continues to make higher highs and higher lows. RSI-35 is positive, on balance volume not (yet?). The near overbought RSI-2 condition has been digested. We will still close XLU if it moves above 51. XLU could be tracing out a messy triangle with support around 50 or 49 and resistance at 50.80 – 51. Our entry was on February 12 at 48.40.

Summary: Some bullish divergences are building, which is positive. The S&P closed today at minor resistance around 2,644. A move above 2,644, followed by 2,695 – 2,700 would increase the odds that a bottom is in.

The US Dollar Index has not moved for the past 4 days. The March 27 low at 88.942 remains key. As long as trade remains above, the US dollar can continue to move higher. The EUR/USD remains still above 1.2240. A move below 1.2240 may well usher in a protracted decline.

Gold bounced from the 61.8% Fibonacci support level, but that bounce has been feeble. On balance volume remains weak.

Silver is trading uninspired between support and resistance.

April 3, 2018 (10:00pm PST)

Our SPY buy order was triggered today at the open (258.87), which was above 258.10 but below 259. SPY closed 260.77, about 0.7% above our entry. The question is whether we want to limit risk and set the stop-loss at breakeven, or give SPY a longer leash.

The March 24 PRR stated: “The 200-day SMA is too popular for its own good, that’s why we rarely talk about it (aside from February 5, because it coincided with important Fibonacci support at 2,536). On February 9, the S&P 500 briefly tested the 200-day SMA, and bounced 269 points. Now the S&P is back at the 200-day SMA. It would almost be too simple if the S&P again bounces 200+ points after hitting the 200-day SMA (as it did in early February). With or without small bounce, a 200-day SMA seesaw seems more likely.”

The S&P 500 (and SPY) closed below the 200-day SMA yesterday and back above today. This seesaw stopped out a large number of 200-day SMA focused investors. We wanted to see a minimum of one seesaw, but more are possible.

Today’s rally gives us the luxury to ‘play with house money.’ Although risk of another seesaw across the 200-day SMA (which is only 0.10 points below our breakeven point) exists, our first consideration is usually safety. We will set the stop-loss for SPY at breakeven. If SPY gaps below 258.87 (S&P 500 futures are down 7 points in after hours trading), we will set the stop-loss at 256.

Investors more afraid of missing out on potential up side than being concerned with down side risk, may keep SPY without stop-loss.

April 2, 2018 (7:30pm PST)

Tonight’s PRR includes an update to the open SPY recommendation.

For the past 7 weeks we’ve frequently referred to our preferred, or ideal path for the S&P 500 going forward. The February 11 PRR suggested a path similar to 2011, and the February 19 PRR reiterated that: “We would like to see a retest of the panic low (W-shaped recovery) like in October 2011 or September 2015.”

The W-shaped recovery (wave 4 correction according to Elliott Wave Theory) was identical to scenario #2 outlined in the February 28 PRR or the blue path featured in the March 7 PRR.

On March 19, the wave 4 scenario (similar to 2011, or scenario #2 or blue path), which required a test of the initial February panic low at 2,533 became our primary focus (March 19, PRR: “The blue wave 4 projection (March 7 PRR) and scenario #2 (February 28 PRR) is now the preferred path.).”

The chart below compares the 2011 correction (and subsequent rally) with the 2018 correction. Today the S&P dropped below 2,590 – 2,575 (March 28 PRR: “We would still like to see a drop below 2,590 – 2,575.”) and came within 21 points of the February panic low.

The S&P dropped below the 200-day SMA (for the first time since June 27, 2016), but closed 0.88 points above the February 9 closing low. Although RSI-35 is stronger than price, it would take a new S&P closing low to call this a bullish divergence. However, the RSI margin is so slim that an immediate S&P drop lower could erase any bullish divergence.

Below is an updated look at short-term sentiment extremes. All VIX-and option-based sentiment gauges had an uptick in bearishness, but not extreme. The green bars highlight the last two W-shaped corrections. Panic readings only occurred on the initial low (left W wing). The same is true this time.

80% of NYSE stocks closed the day lower, but the NY Composite a/d line is still above its February and March lows.

Our two-prong SPY buy recommendation required: 1) a drop below 256.25 and 2) a subsequent rally above 258.10. The chart below shows the 256.25 and 258.10 level. SPY did not meet both qualifications. The SPY buy order was not triggered. See summary section below for update SPY buy levels.

Unlike the S&P 500, SPY closed below its February low and displays a bullish RSI-35 divergence.

The same is true for the DJIA (new closing low, bullish divergence).

As anticipated, double support around QQQ 154.50 acted as magnet. QQQ fell as low as 153.88, but closed at 155.51. Even though QQQ remained above its February low, RSI-35 and on balance volume are at or below February level. Not bullish.

Summary: The S&P 500 has met the minimum criteria to consider this correction complete. There is, however, a difference between minimum and ideal. The ideal target is 2,530 – 2,460 (see chart below published in the March 24 PRR). S&P 500 futures are up 10 points in after hour trading. At current price, the S&P 500 would open above its 200-day SMA. SPY would gap higher an open above 258.10. It would take at least a 130-point rally to get an initial confirmation that the bottom is in. Since there is a chance the S&P won’t drop into our ideal down side target, investors may need to ‘pick their poison.’

1) Be early and risk further losses

2) Be late and risk missing out on gains.

In short, the minimum target has been met, but we would prefer to see the S&P drop into and reverse in the ideal target zone (2,530 – 2,460).

We will buy SPY at the open or during the day (as long as it is above 258.10 but below 259). Our initial allocation is a conservative 5%. Our stop-loss will be at 256.

April 1, 2018 (5:30pm PST)

For the first time since February 2016, the S&P 500 suffered two consecutive montly red candles. Since the beginning of the 2009 bull market, the S&P recorded more than 2 consecutive red candles on 6 occasions (3 x 2 month, 1 x 3 month, 1 x 5 month, current – purple boxes). After the 3 x 2 red candles (Aug/Sep 2015, Apr/May 2012, May/Jun 2010) the S&P briefly broke below the prior low twice (Jun 2012, Jul 2010) and came within 25 points of the prior low once (Oct 2015). In February 2016 (the 1 x 3 month period), the third red candle exceeded the prior low by only 2 points.

The S&P 500 doesn’t have to rhyme with prior consecutive monthly declines, but if it does, it would be in harmony with our ideal path of one more new low followed by rising prices.

As mentioned on Wednesday, “sentiment is bearish enough to spark a bounce.” The bounce happened on Thursday, and may continue on Monday (first trading day of April has a solid bullish bias, S&P 500 up 17 of last 23 years, average gain: 0.49%).

Minor short-term resistance remains around 2,640-ish and 2,690-ish.

Below is a renewed look at our set of short-term sentiment gauges. The extremes seen around the February panic low have been digested. During double-bottoms (W-shaped corrections), investors are almost always more optimistic during the second ‘W’ low. That’s why a new closing low (if it occurs) will probably not cause the same kind of panic seen in early February, and set up a bullish divergence.

Our New York Composite advance/decline liquidity indicator shows a similar pattern. The NYC a/d line has been trending higher (green line) and down side pressure seen in late March was less intense than in early February (in early February nearly 90% of stocks declined, in late March ‘only’ 80% of stocks declined – vertical red bars & green line).

Short-term, the DJIA closed above the trend channel shown on Wednesday. As the purple lines show, DJIA could carve out a triangle (purple lines, S&P shows similar formation). This kind of micro-analysis during larger waves 4 is less reliable than at other times, but it’s about the only thing somewhat worth mentioning right now.

XLU closed (barely) above red trend line resistance. RSI-35 confirmed this move, on balance volume did not. RSI-2 is near overbought. Next resistance is just above 51. The positives we saw near the February low are starting to fade a bit, and XLU will have to overcome 51 to unlock further upside. If XLU rallies to 51 on Monday/Tuesday, RSI-2 will likely be fully overbought. We will lock in gains and sell XLU if it spikes above 51.

Summary: Short-term sentiment and money flow (liquidity) suggest that fear and selling pressure are improving, setting the stage for bullish divergences. For a true bullish divergence, we would have to see a new S&P 500 closing low, which is what we’re waiting for to confirm our ideal path for a more significant bottom.

Although we are looking to buy, our indicators and cycles do not project massive up side, even once a low is in place.

The EUR/USD, US Dollar Index, gold and silver did not move much since Wednesday’s PRR.

March 28, 2018 (6:10pm PST)

The market will be closed on Friday in observance of Good Friday. The next update will be published as usual on Sunday.

The week started with a massive rally (Monday) and was followed by an even bigger drop (Tuesday). Normally pops and drops like Monday/Tuesday would validate a special PRR, but considering the larger context (March 19 PRR: “Waves 4 cause a lot of whipsaw and require patience. There may well be times where it will feel like we missed an opportunity … just before stocks reverse and offer a second [or even third] chance.”) it’s sometimes best not to over-analyze certain moves.

The S&P 500 is stomping around atop the blue support cluster at 2,590 – 2,570. We would still like to see a drop below 2,590 – 2,575 (ideally to around 2,530 or 2,460), but short-term sentiment is bearish enough to spark a bounce.

Pinpointing resistance levels in a wave 4 environment tends to be a fools errand, but 2,645-ish and 2,690-ish may be worth watching. A move above 2,645-ish could lead to 2,690-ish, but such a bounce would not eliminate the potential for a drop below 2,590.

The hourly DJIA chart below outlines a short-term trend channel and potential short-term Elliott Wave Theory count. If that’s correct, DJIA should drop below 23,360, find support (ideally at 23,000 – 22,800) and rally.

Double Nasdaq-100 QQQ support around 154.50 could act as magnet and reversal target. At this point, there is no bullish divergence as RSI-35 is toying with new lows (even though QQQ remains above its February low) and on balance volume is already at new lows.

Summary: This is a difficult environment to trade, which is why we trade only if the S&P follows our ideal path (drop below 2,590 at minimum, followed by a rally). The current constellation of various indicators suggests that carving out a low may be a process that could take a few more days, even weeks. For now we will keep our SPY buy recommendation open.

We will take another close look at investor sentiment and money flow in Sunday’s PRR.

As anticipated, the US Dollar Index tested trend channel support at 88.90 (blue oval). From there it rallied strongly. Yesterday’s low (blue oval) could be important and can be used as a stop-loss level for long positions (like UUP). We may soon be adding to our existing UUP position.

Short-term, the EUR/USD allows for a triangle (purple lines), with a potential bullish breakout. This doesn’t have to happen, but it could. If it does, it would likely lead to a test of the long-term trend channel at 1.2620 (black line) and a great opportunity to short the euro (long dollar). A break below 1.2240 would very likely mean that a EUR/USD top (and dollar bottom) is in and signal a longer-term trend reversal.

Long-term, the EUR/USD shows a bearish RSI divergence, is close to long-term trend channel resistance, with cycles soon turning lower, and sentiment supporting falling euro prices.

Gold validated our suspicion and fell hard, retracing almost exactly 61.8% of the March 20 – 27 rally. If gold started a rally with a target north of 1,382 (wave 3 up next?), it should stay above Fibonacci support at 1,328 or 1,318. For aggressive traders, this is a low-risk opportunity to go long with a stop-loss just below support.

Of course, a strong gold rally is unlikely if the US Dollar Index is also about to rally.

Silver is once again back at support around 16.2.

This is a follow up to the 30-year Treasuries analysis published on March 14 PRR.

TLT closed above the bold (previously red, now) green trend line. According to Elliott Wave Theory, TLT can still relapse to a new low. However, a move above 122.42 as good as eliminates this bearish option. Cycles are pointing higher. In short, the trend is higher as long as TLT stays above ascending trend line support (120.40) and once TLT clears 122.42.

Below is an updated look at the 30-year Treasury Yield trend channel shown on March 14. Since then there’ve been two more trend channel touch points. A sustain yield break below 3% (based on trend channel) and 2.98% (based on Elliott Wave Theory) will point to lower yields/higher prices.

Continued updates and analysis is available via the Profit Radar Report.

Simon Maierhofer is the founder of iSPYETF and the publisher of the Profit Radar Report. Barron’s rated iSPYETF as a “trader with a good track record” (click here for Barron’s profile of the Profit Radar Report). The Profit Radar Report presents complex market analysis (S&P 500, Dow Jones, gold, silver, euro and bonds) in an easy format. Technical analysis, sentiment indicators, seasonal patterns and common sense are all wrapped up into two or more easy-to-read weekly updates. All Profit Radar Report recommendations resulted in a 59.51% net gain in 2013, 17.59% in 2014, and 24.52% in 2015.

Follow Simon on Twitter @ iSPYETF or sign up for the FREE iSPYETF Newsletter to get actionable ETF trade ideas delivered for free.

If you enjoy quality, hand-crafted research, >> Sign up for the FREE iSPYETF Newsletter